AI Agents
October 15, 2026
1 min read
8 views

Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0: Automating Diverse Task Construction and Measuring Sustained Agent Progress

Original Source

ArXiv AI (cs.AI)

by Zongxia Li, Zhongzhi Li, Yucheng Shi, Ruhan Wang, Junyao Yang, Chengsong Huang, Zhichao Liu, Xiyang Wu, Anhao Li, Yue Yu, Ergan Shang, Fuxiao Liu, Tong Zheng, Ninghao Liu, Lichao Sun, Haitao Mi, Leowei Liang
arXiv:2610.14146v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon terminal benchmarks measure whether an agent can sustain progress through extended workflows with process rewards, not only whether its final state passes a binary check. We present Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0 (LHTB

arXiv:2610.14146v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon terminal benchmarks measure whether an agent can sustain progress through extended workflows with process rewards, not only whether its final state passes a binary check. We present Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0 (LHTB 2.0), an extension of Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench that preserves its 46 original tasks while correcting task and evaluation-infrastructure defects and extending 31 tasks. LHTB 2.0 contains 77 tasks across 13 domains and eight task types. The extended tasks are produced through a systematic reconstruction-task pipeline. We start from a working scientific or engineering artifact, then use a parameterized reference implementation to generate multiple scenarios, reveal six as behavioral evidence, hold out three for evaluation, and use dense progress ladders to reward partial progress while preventing memorization of public outputs. We also extend the evaluation horizon from 90 minutes to three hours and record verifier checkpoints every 30 minutes, enabling direct measurement of sustained progress within a run. Across 1,145 scored model-task runs from 15 frontier models, GPT-6-astra leads with dense mean reward 0.69 and 37 tasks at R at least 0.95, followed by GPT-5.6-sol with dense mean reward 0.67 and 32 tasks at the same threshold. On the 30 reconstruction tasks, binary verifier scores average 0.221, whereas dense ladder scores average 0.653, showing that outcome-only evaluation discards substantial intermediate progress. LHTB 2.0 provides a broader, hardened, and process-aware testbed for studying reliable agent execution over hours.

Tags:AIAgent

Original Content Credit

This summary is sourced from ArXiv AI (cs.AI). For the complete article with full details, research data, and author insights, please visit the original source.

Visit ArXiv AI (cs.AI)

Related Articles

Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence
ArXiv AI (cs.AI)
Industry News1m

Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence

arXiv:2610.14005v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Under the accelerated pace of AI development, any benchmark whose difficulty is calibrated with humans or current AI systems becomes circular, or saturates soon. How can we then evaluate machines that may become more capable than th

Oct 15, 2026
ClawLoop: Self-Improving Agents via Harness-Native Training Loop
ArXiv AI (cs.AI)
AI Agents1m

ClawLoop: Self-Improving Agents via Harness-Native Training Loop

arXiv:2610.14118v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has driven their deployment toward general-purpose harness environments, where LLM-based agents operate in sandbox workspaces and interact directly with file systems and shells.

Oct 15, 2026