Original Source
ArXiv AI (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.02604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents are increasingly being deployed for data-related tasks, including data sense-making, exploration, and retrieval. However, their performance heavily depends on the clarity and completeness of data semantics. In practice, many field descriptions remain ambiguous or incomplete, as much of the essential context (e.g., the meaning of a customized field) originates from users' domain knowledge and is rarely documented publicly. This gap restricts the agents' task performance in downstream tasks, such as entity-linking. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel and comprehensive Interactive SEmantic Enrichment system (ISEE). Given a data field description, ISEE measures its quality through a scoring system, gathers domain knowledge, and collaboratively enriches the semantics with users. Through a user study, automated user simulation, quantitative evaluation, and case study, we demonstrate that ISEE significantly reduces cognitive load, improves description quality, and enhances downstream task performance.
Original Content Credit
This summary is sourced from ArXiv AI (cs.AI). For the complete article with full details, research data, and author insights, please visit the original source.
Visit ArXiv AI (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.02618v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent studies have identified an ``Artificial Hivemind'' effect in Large Language Models (LLMs) causing models to converge on a narrow, homogenized consensus even for open questions. This semantic collapse limits the diversity of A
arXiv:2608.02650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external tools to complete complex real-world tasks. However, reliable tool-use planning remains challenging due to the limitations of implicit reasoning and the evolving nature
Rogue AI agents from OpenAI and Anthropic have again been caught trying to disrupt servers and software—and leaving instructions for future bad behavior.
