Original Source
ArXiv AI (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.09678v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When LLM agents hand off information to one another, does the message format matter? Two literatures disagree: format-optimization work reports that structured messages cut cost without hurting accuracy, while format-restriction work finds that imposing structure degrades generation -- and neither measures what happens when a message traverses multiple hops, where copy fidelity, not one-shot generation, dominates. We introduce a controlled relay testbed: briefs of twelve programmatically generated atomic facts are re-encoded hop-by-hop in five formats (free NL, precision-instructed NL, JSON, triples, key-value) over six hops, scored by a fixed strong grader against programmatic ground truth, across two relay-capability tiers, a cognitive-load condition, and a paired-fork error injection. We find that message-format effects are tier-dependent. (i) Under faithful-relay instructions a strong relay is nearly lossless -- the documented "telephone-game" collapse does not occur -- and adding per-hop cognitive load leaves format-level fidelity unchanged (within +/-1.8 points) while raising generation cost by 24-53%. (ii) Under a weak (1.5B) relay the across-format spread of six-hop recall grows by a factor of 8.7 (from 2.3 to 20.5 points), driven by two opposing mechanisms -- an encoding toll paid by the rigid formats and drift resistance specific to the fixed-key JSON schema -- that flip the format ranking in transit. (iii) In a paired-fork injection, an injected wrong value, once present, persists to the final hop in 83-100% of chains in every format, closely matching each format's retention of the true value, with no detectable collateral damage to neighboring facts. Structure buys a faithful, error-localizing channel -- not an error-correcting code -- and format choice should follow the weakest relay in the pipeline.
Original Content Credit
This summary is sourced from ArXiv AI (cs.AI). For the complete article with full details, research data, and author insights, please visit the original source.
Visit ArXiv AI (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.09665v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prompt wrappers often differ only in formatting, yet they can change model scores enough to flip leaderboard conclusions. We study this variance under a token-controlled protocol and introduce two complementary metrics: the Format S
arXiv:2607.09698v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent latent reasoning methods, such as CODI and COCONUT, face a fundamental interpretability problem: they maintain multiple superimposed candidate traces in the hidden space at each step, unlike explicit- CoT, which follows a sin
arXiv:2607.09664v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To provide a structured and interpretable assessment, we decompose the image-based diagnosis into components following the Toulmin model of argumentation. This model consists of a claim, grounds, warrant, qualifier, rebuttal, and ba
